Thursday, May 31, 2012

NBA Draft

I was amazed to see New Orleans get the first pick (conspiracy theories here we come!). I always like seeing things like a draft become chaotic, it adds excitement. New Orleans will draft Anthony Davis, even if their top priority was a different position, he's just too good of a player to pass up. I am for him playing PF until he bulks up and can handle the C role in the NBA. As for the other 9 teams in the top 10, this is how I think it will fall and why (not an NBA analyst, probably will get all of this wrong, but it's just my opinion)...

#1 New Orleans- Anthony Davis-PF/C-Kentucky

#2 Charlotte- Thomas Robinson-PF-Kansas-Charlotte has many holes, as do several teams. When that is the case, go with the most sure player. Charlotte has an alright back court, they need someone in the front cournt.

#3 Washington- Michael Kidd-Gilchrist-SF-Kentucky- If Charlotte doesn't draft Robinson, Washington should take him, if they do, then draft “Kid”. He brings the energy, he's got great determination and playability. Washington needs pieces too, and a center could be in the cards as well. But with Nene still on the team, do they want to take a risk on Andre Drummond becoming Kwame Brown or Hasheem Thabeet?

#4 Cleveland- Bradley Beal-SG-Florida- I haven't heard much about this guy, but he's popping up on draft boards as high as #2 (14.8ppg, 6.7rpg). Once again, if Washington doesn't get Kidd-Gilchrist, then Cleveland should (Irving's high school teammate=dynamic duo). They could use a SG, but aren't getting much offense in the front court. If they draft Beal, they'd better be sure one year in FLA was enough to start his growth.

#5 Sacramento- Harrison Barnes-SF-North Carolina- Need a SF, Barnes is next on the list. He has skills, but was outplayed last year and that hurt his draft stock.

#6 Portland- Jared Sullinger-PF-The Ohio State- Hope Sullinger has great knees, because Portland has been cursed for guys with less than stellar knees. With Sullinger at PF, Aldridge can play C full-time.

#7 Golden State- Tyler Zeller-F/C-North Carolina/Andre Drummond-C-Connecticut- Golden State lacks a scorer in the middle. With Zeller you get a complete F/C, while Drummond gives you a scorer with shot blocking ability. Zeller is more proven, Drummond has potential but also might be gone by this pick.

#8 Toronto- Jeremy Lamb-SG-Connecticut- Lamb has a lot of potential and length. He can play SF as well as SG, which could work well with Toronto with C Jonas Valančiūnas joining the team (2011 first round pick). Toronto hopefully can unlock Lamb's potential, and light a fire under him so he can truly play to his fullest.

#9 Detroit- Tyler Zeller-F/C-North Carolina/Andre Drummond-C-Connecticut- Whoever doesn't get picked by Golden State (or earlier in the draft), the Pistons draft that player, plain and simple.

#10 New Orleans- Meyers Leonard-C-Illinois- If New Orleans isn't committed to Chris Kaman, they should draft Meyers Leonard. Not as talented as the other centers or swing centers in the draft, but his size and growth could help the expanding Hornets.

*- Jared Sullinger has been rumored to have back concerns. He has had injuries in the past involving his back, and has lost a good deal of playing time because of it. He's fallen out of the top ten and I am agreeing with this. Portland has to roll the dice, but if they can rig the dice it would help the fans.
Winners- New Orleans Hornets, Portland Trailblazers- New Orleans gets the #1 pick, as well as #10. Portland jumps and takes Brooklyn's pick, getting the #6th, as well as their own pick at #11.

Losers- Washington Wizards, Brooklyn Nets, Charlotte Bobcats. The Wizards fell to #3, potentially ruining plans they'd had since the last game of the season. Charlotte has the worst season percentage-wise ever in the NBA, and don't get the #1 pick. Lastly, Brooklyn loses their only first round pick, and have to wait (unless they do massive moves to trade up) until the fourth-last pick in the draft to choose a player. New city, new arena, but not a new beginning the Nets wanted.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

NJ vs LA

                                          Let the excitement continue!!!!!


It feels like a flashback to 2003. An exciting playoffs, with amazing goaltending has lead up to the Stanley Cup Final. This time though it's New Jersey facing a different southern California team in the form of the Los Angeles Kings. Both teams are riding great goaltending from Jonathan Quick and Martin Broudeur. The eight seed Kings have beaten the best the West has had to offer to get to the cup, and made it look relatively easy, only losing 2 games in the entire playoffs. Both teams have had their star players on offense playing in high gear. Both teams have made trades (LA mostly using Edmonton to build), while New Jersey famously went through a lot of trouble, and more growing pains to see Ilya Kovalchuk succeed. Kovalchuk and Ryan Carter will have to play their best to even things out with Dustin Brown and Anze Kopitar.

Who will win this series- N/A- I am an Anaheim fan, therefore I will not cheer for another Pacific Division team to win the Stanley Cup, let alone another California team...rivalries, ya know? Why not cheer for New Jersey? They beat the Ducks back in 2003 in a spectacular, memorable, heartbreaking series. I just want to sit back and enjoy this series as a neutral fan.

Who will win the Conn Smythe trophy- Whichever team wins this series, their goaltender will probably win it. Quick has been solid all playoffs, and, baring a horrendous final, may be another player to win the MVP on a losing team. Broudeur has stepped up his play since round one. He wins the Cup, and the Conn Smythe, he'd be a fool not to retire.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Roscoe Smith to UNLV

                                          The Runnin Rebels are feeling mighty tall



I know I'm late with this blog, but this turned out to be better. I was angry that Roscoe Smith would pass up 30 minutes a game in Storrs to go to Las Vegas, but then I got some information that clarified things for me, as well as put together some imformation that was already known. UNLV is tournament eligible this coming season, UConn is not. UNLV just signed the 7th best high school player in the country in the form of Anthony Bennett, while UConn has an incoming class that lacks buzz, but fills the holes in their lineup. The information I found out later from (blog site) is that Roscoe Smith wants to switch from PF to SF, and UConn with Tyler Olander and DeAndre Daniels taking up that slot, there wasn't much chance he'd get what he wanted.

Winners- UNLV, Roscoe Smith, Phillip Nolan- UNLV gets a seasoned player from a power conference (to compliment the other two transfers they are getting, as well as their high school players), Roscoe Smith gets to play on a team that surely will make the NCAA tournament this year, and next year, and gets to play Small Forward...hopefully for him. Phillip Nolan (for those of you googling him) is the signed PF out of Milwaukee, Wisconsin the Huskies recruited. 6'10, 220, a left-handed PF that will shoot the three when needed, he fills a void left by Smith. He'll start, play a lot of minutes, and learn the system, which is good, because I see him playing for at least three years at UConn.

Losers- UConn- Obviously the Huskies wanted Smith to stay, what with all the transfers, early-leavers, and no post season. They lose a veteran who knew their system, would've started, played all but 10 minutes of the game, and been a factor in their offense and defense. Now the Huskies have to figure out what kind of system is best suited for them to run this year.

I like UNLV and wish Smith the best. The anger is gone (though I wouldn't mind seeing UConn face UNLV and beat them down the road with Smith on the team), have fun in the Mountain West.


Monday, May 28, 2012

Best Is In The West



 Say what you will about the Atlantic Division in the Eastern Conference (4 teams in the playoffs, all over 100 points). Make a case for the Central Division in the Western Conference (4 teams in the playoffs, all over 100 points). In my opinion: the best is out west, the Pacific Division to be exact. In the final year of division play before the NHL switch to four conferences (eventually I see divisions coming back), the Pacific Division was the best division in the NHL. Until around the final week and a half of the season, all five teams in the division (Dallas, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Jose, Anaheim) were all in playoff contention. Anaheim has the worst start of any team in the NHL and with the talent they have that was uncalled for. They got it together and almost completed the comeback. Dallas was always there, and even led the Pacific at times, but missed out on the playoffs by 3 wins. San Jose entered the playoffs for another year, this time the 7th seed. Phoenix ended up with the 3rd seed, beating a talented Chicago Blackhawks team, then took down another good team in Nashville. LA was the 8th seed, but has dominated the playoffs, beating the President's Cup winner and defending Western Conference champions in Vancouver, then 2nd seeded St. Louis, and finally 3rd seeded Phoenix, losing only two games through all three series. What makes this division also better is the lack of a true cellar team. The Atlantic has the Islanders (N.Y.), the Central has the Blue Jackets (Columbus). Anaheim contested near the end, neither of the previous two teams didn't.

Best Division in The East- Atlantic
Best Division in The West- Pacific
Best Division in The NHL- Pacific

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Down to Business

A little more painful than I expected, even with the sanctions the NCAA put on the Huskies (and the sanctions may still be dropped, though likely not). It's time for the UConn Huskies to get down to business and focus on their season coming this fall. May is here, some ESPN top 100 still need signing, but for the most part the waters are still.

Omar Calhoun looks to be signed up good and tight for the year (thank you basketball God). His addition to the back court gives UConn another shooter to take pressure off Boatright and Napier. Shabazz may be ready to assume full responsibility of the team (I hope so), but Boatright needs to know that he has another shooting option in the back court. R.J. Evans, being a veteran college basketball player helps the back court with leadership, as well.

Phillip Nolan is a welcome relief on a team that lost 9 of 16 players to either early exit or graduation. A local boy from my home state (Wisconsin), his 6-10, 205 body will be a a good fit in an offense that tends to run the court. He is best as a power forward, and with Roscoe Smith gone, he should be the starter unless Calhoun wants to run a small lineup like Marquette with the abundance of guards. Nolan can play all three front court positions, awesome! But as much as I'd like to see the left-handed Freshmen play at Center, if he's best at PF, he will play that. Enosch Wolf, Husky Nation is calling you out and calling on you to step up and achieve your full potential.

In researching recruiting for UConn, I found a new, signed member of the Husky family: Leon Tolksdorf, the third German-born player on the team, alongside Wolf and Giffy. A 6'7 freshmen who plays PF, I'm not as confident with this choice as I'd like to be. Phillip Nolan will have that position, and plays best there. With Tolksdorf now in the fold, it could be that Calhoun wants a front-court of Olander, Tolksdorf, and Nolan playing center. If Nolan can step up to that, I'll be more than happy. This move may be to add depth too, but with scholarships limited, even with the departures, UConn has to use them wisely. Chris Obekpa is still out there, and I wouldn't mind having him on the team and allowing him to use this season to grow.

Drummond and Lamb left for the NBA, I expected that. Alex Oriakhi transferred to Missouri, he's a senior and NBA bound after this upcoming season, that I'm okay with. Michael Bradley transferred to Western Kentucky to be closer to his ailing grandma, that I understand and send my prayers to him and his family. Roscoe Smith...WHY!?!?!?! His minutes increased to a little over 25 this season. He was going to be the starter for sure this year, maybe play 30 a game...and now transfer? He's not at this moment good enough to be drafted in the first round of the NBA Draft next year, and is projected to go second round or undrafted (http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft/results/players?id=19609&_slug_=roscoe-smith&action=upsell&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnba%2fdraft%2fresults%2fplayers%3fid%3d19609%26_slug_%3droscoe-smith) He is passing up a lot and has two years of eligibility left. I think it's a stupid move. Everyone remembers the Texas game in 2009 when he threw up the prayer from almost full court...leaving 7.5 seconds left for a Texas team that thankfully shot horrible that day and Kemba Walker had the ice water in his veins. Have fun Roscoe, we'll remember you for this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL3f7xxsQ6c)

UConn plays in the Paradise Jam tournament this season. George Mason, Iona, Mercer, New Mexico, Quinnipiac Illinois-Chicago and Wake Forest are also involved in the tournament. Regardless of who they face, WIN! Win the tournament and make a statement for yourselves.

Starting Lineup time. ROLL CALL!

Starting

PG- Shabazz Napier
SG- Ryan Boatright
PF-Phillip Nolan
SF-Tyler Olander
C-Enosch Wolf

Bench

PG- R.J. Evans
SG- Omar Calhoun
PF- Leon Tolksdorf
G- Niles Giffey
G/F- Deandre Daniels
G-Brendan Allen
F-Benjamin Stewart

Calhoun has a lot to work with. Daniels should flourish this year (I want him to). I want to see Brendan Allen and Benjamin Stewart used more. I want to see Enosch Wolf shock the NCAA world and show he isn't just another 7'1 guy. What style of offense will be run? They have the talent to go three-guard with Daniels and Nolan in the front court. They can also go shooters with Boatright, Napier, Calhoun, Giffy, and Daniels, or go with the traditional offense with each specific position represented on the court. This time is important! Use it to figure out what works best, learn about each other, grow, gel, and develop chemistry. Play for each other, outclass last years team and show the NCAA that nothing can stop Husky Nation!

Check out these vids for some highlights on two of the newest members of Husky Nation




Sunday, May 20, 2012

Anaheim Checklist

                                               (This end starts in the off-season)

Ducks season has been over for some time now, and there are a few things they need to do to make sure they don't repeat what occurred this season.

Anaheim To-Do List
Re-sign all needed players
Cut any unneeded players
Draft
Free agency
Prep for the future

Players that need to be re-signed-

Saku Koivu has been resigned, and with him on the team next year hopefully Teemu Selanne will follow. Teemu lead the team in points, he has to be signed, even if he was 100 years old.

Francois Beauchemin and Rod Pelley both need to be resigned. Pelley can put in more minutes and his contract is cheap. Beauchemin is a solid defender and the Ducks need that.

I'm all for Sheldon Brookbank and Niklas Hagman getting resigned as well. Both were good coming off the bench for Anaheim in filing minutes and contributing. They will get more ice time and know the team, and with Bruce Boudreau signed on for two more years, they need players that know the system and his style of coaching.

Players needing to be cut-

Dan Ellis must be cut. He's injury prone and unreliable. He wasn't good enough when Anaheim was suffering during the first half of the season, and he wasn't good enough last season when it was him and Ray Emery (who I think the Blackhawks got for a steal at 600,000 in the off-season). He's taking up 1.5 million that I think could be used elsewhere, and with the signing of a new backup to Hiller, Ellis is out of here (at least he should be.

George Parros can go, though I won't mind seeing him stay. His contract is cheap, he's tough...but he missed almost half the season with injuries. Parros is a toss-up.
Players I don't know what to do with

The only question mark I have is Jason Blake. He was injured a good portion of the year, his contract is 3 million dollars, he's 38 years old. Despite that, he's an experienced left wingman for the Ducks. If you cut him, the young guys need to step up to cover what he brings (that's you Hagman and Beleskey). If you resign him, a restructured contract is in order.

Explore Free Agency and the Draft

The Ducks have around 19 million in cap space to use to sign guys on their team, as well as explore free agency. What they do in the draft will determine how aggressive they are. With the sixth pick in the draft, they must draft defense. Cam Fowler was a steal and has paid off in a big way. Adding another defender to compliment the speed and ability Fowler has is ideal. A powerful defender who can score would work like a ying and yang combination in the Ducks zone. With the cap room after resigning everyone they need to resign, they may still have something around 10 million to spend on free agents. At least do some looking

Plan for the future

The Ducks will have an estimate 45.7 million in cap room (http://capgeek.com/charts.php?Team=6). Getzlaf and Perry will need resigning, as will Visnovsky, all needed players for the success of the Ducks. Teemu and Koivu and Blake will most all likely retire. Factoring all things in, along with resigning all the players that need to be signed this year, the Ducks could make several moves in the off-season of 2014, but the time is now as well.

Plan for what will happen next year, plan this off-season, and give it your all this season. Why not send the veteran players out winners?

SportsBlogs

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Dead in The Desert

all stats for game 2 can be seen at http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/gametracker/recap/NHL_20120515_LA@PHO
                                  The Kings are halfway to the Clarence Campbell Bowl
 
When both Conference championships are between teams that are in the same division in each conference (Atlantic in the East, Pacific in the West), the teams tend to know each other very well. The Rangers and Devils have a history between the two of them, and that series is progressing to be a good one (series tied 1-1). Los Angeles and Phoenix have little history other than regular season matchups. The Kings are up 2-0 in the series, have lost one game in the playoffs so far (that against Vancouver at the Kings), and now are taking the series the short travel distance from the dessert to the city of angels. Phoenix lost Game 2 because they played dirty, made penalties, which cause mistakes, which cause goals against your team. Before last night, Phoenix had given up only 4 goals in almost 40 power plays during the playoffs, they gave up two last night. A 5 on 3 should resolve in a goal, so I won't blame Mike Smith, but I blame his teammates for hitting the Kings in the numbers the way they know is not tolerated by refs (especially in the playoffs). Phoenix will probably get one win in this series, but the Kings are looking really good as the West rep. for the Cup.

-Kings the 2nd team in the last three years to win 7 straight road playoff games. Last time to do that was Chicago in 2010 (Won Stanley Cup).
-Phoenix's Martin Hanzal suspended one game for boarding Dustin Brown. Brown is frustrating the Coyotes, and it's showing

Saturday, May 12, 2012

No Good, All Bad, Plenty of Ugly

(After the Feb. 1st loss @ Georgetown)
(all scores and stats can be found on http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/teams/schedule/CT/connecticut-huskies)

(My apologizes for not creating a blog during the season, it never crossed my mind as I was writing just for the fun of it. These articles have not been altered for content after having been written.)

The new year has not been kind to Storrs and the Huskies of UConn...then again, they haven't been kind to themselves. UConn has dropped now six of their last eight games, notching only two wins within the first calendar year of 2012. Their play hasn't been that great in the only two wins either, a home win against a depleted St. Jon's team, and a comeback at Notre Dame (I did savor this win because ND was the bane of the Huskies season last year, winning both games by a combined 6 points, and Ben Hansbrough winning Big East PotY when Kemba had a much better season, and was more critical to his team). At this point I'm wishing Kemba Walker was still on the team. The wouldn't be undefeated, but the flow of the team would be much better than it is right now. Enough wasting time, I'll get into what has been good so far, what has been bad, and what has been ugly.

Good 

Andre Drummond. I have to start off with the man who has weathered the hype, as well as Big East play so far. He has been consistent with his shots and has scored points and brought down rebounds for Connecticut. Thirteen games in double figures, fifty-two blocks on the year, and seven games with over ten rebounds. I expected him to average ten points a game, and that's what he's doing. He's playing his role perfectly.

Before 2012- Huskies were 12-1, the only loss being a surprising loss to Central Florida (16-6 as of 2/1), in the second round of the Battle for Atlantis tournament, a tournament I viewed as UConn's to lose despite teams like Harvard and Florida State being there. UConn in 2011 had wins against FSU, Wagner (17-4, win @ Pitt which is turning into a good team after a horrible start), Arkansas (16-6) and Harvard.

Ryan Boatright- I've watched this guy since finding out that UConn recruited him (this was back in April or so, if not even before then. Yes, I was looking into the recruiting as UConn got ready for their great run). After the FSU game (his first time on the court after the six game suspension, I knew he would be a contributor, and a key piece to the puzzle that was the UConn team. He's played in eleven games (should be more, shame on the NCAA), averaging just under ten points. His quickness, ball-handling, and playing ability has been refreshing at the PG position, which has shown to have its flaws when he's been off the court.

Tyler Olander- I hoped for the guy to have sharpened his skills over the summer break, and he looks like he has. He does his job, he knows his role on the team, and doesn't deviate from that plan. I compare him with Gavin Edwards from a few years ago, because Edwards was the same way. Edwards went on to be the best player from that team. Jerome Dyson and Stanley Robinson who?

Bad
Losses to UCF, SH, RUG, CIN, TEN, ND

UCF- In a tournament that was again, in my opinion there's to lose, UConn let up a 17-point lead with 16 minutes left...in 10 minutes!?!? Not only that, but to go on another drought with the game on the line, going cold and scoring only two points in six of the final seven minutes of the game? That is unacceptable,

SH- This isn't a bad loss, it was bad the way it happened for UConn. Jordan Theodore and Herb Pope I expected to have typical games, if not one of them to get above 20 points. But to let four players get into double figures? 6:15 left in the first half, with the score 19-19, that was the closest it got for the Huskies. They did shoot over ninty percent from the free throw line (11-12 made).

RUG- The Scarlet Knights were supposed to be the game where UConn would get back on track. Their coach was back, Rutgers wasn't that scary of a team, should've been a UConn win and things get straightened out. Instead, the Huskies go 4-19 from the 3-point line, and though out rebounded the Knights, lost by seven. Twenty turnovers and a conference loss that should've been a win couldn't have left a good taste in Calhoun's mouth.

CIN- Again, Cincinnati isn't a bad team. UConn allowed four of the five Bearcat starters to get into double figures, allowed an 11-26 night behind the 3-point arc, and though they tried, couldn't stop Kilpatrick from hitting the game-winning three with Lamb doing his best to make Kilpatrick shoot blind. UConn shot good, out-rebounded the Bearcats, and shot 75% from the charity stripe, but couldn't hold on. Another cold stretch of four minutes in the final seven didn't help their chances as well.

TEN- On the road, against a decent team, but only a decent team at (8-10) before the game. Napier and Lamb took most of the shots, which I believe was part of the problem. Drummond should've been getting more touches in these games. He took less than 10 shots in the losses to SH, RUG, CIN, and TEN, and though he did miss a lot of the shots he took, I think continued pressure inside would've done some good against Tennessee. Drummond had at least 20 pounds and roughly two inches on the tallest players Tennessee had to offer, he could've continued to bang away and the Volunteers may have caved. UConn shot terrible from the 3-point line (6-18) and let Jarnell Stokes go off for 16 points and 12 rebounds in just his third collegiate game. Props though to the young man, who graduated high school a semester early, and though not practicing much with the team, stepped up big after having played against a giant task in Kentucky.

ND-At home against a team that'd just knocked off the #1 team in the country, it screams “LET DOWN!” for Notre Dame. Down three at half, the Fighting Irish went on a 13-0 run to open the 2nd half, not allowing the Huskies to score until eight minutes into the half. Napier was cold, missing every one of the seven shots he took, and UConn went 3-13 from behind the arc. The Huskies scored a season-low 48 points, at home none the less, and with three seconds left, and a possible chance to win the game if someone can get a good enough look and launch a three-pointer, UConn puts the rock in Shabazz Napier's hands, the guy who hadn't made a shot all day was going to hit a half-court runner to win? That would've been cool, but I would've given the ball to Boatright or Lamb. Yes, Boatright had just came back from having to serve another suspension for further investigation regarding details about the first suspension, but he'd made 3-6. Let's not forget Lamb, who was 6-9 for the game. Either of those two over Napier, and I like Napier.

Ugly

Georgetown- Having just watched parts of the game, highlights, and checked through the stats, I am appalled at how UConn played (and that's saying something considering their now 4-game losing streak). They played with no enthusiasm, no defense, and couldn't shoot to save their lives. Lamb, Boatright, and Napier combined to go 4-31, all the shots being made by Lamb. The one bright moment in this game was that Lamb made all four of his free throws he attempted, while the team went a total 6-13 from the line. The Huskies played uninspired, and when they continued to miss shots, they let up shots on defense. This can't continue.

Play of the veterans- Oriahki, Napier, Lamb, the guys that have the ring from last year, the veterans. These guys should be playing much better than they are. Oriahki was miffed early on because of his lack of playing time. Drummond coming into the mix and playing better as the season has progressed has indeed cut into Oriahki's playing time at Center, but he's also able to play Power Forward. Oriahki has had just four games with 10 or more points, and only in the UCF game did he secure 10 or more rebounds this season (10). Oriahki should be AVERAGING 10 and 10 a game. If he wants more playing time, he has to show that he deserves it, wants it.

Napier reminds me of Kemba Walker in his first two years: potential, but rough around the edges. Shabazz has tried throughout the year to be what Kemba was last year, and that just isn't him. He is a great defensive guard who should stick to pressing the other teams guards until they are out of their rhythm, taking shots when he gets them, but not too many. He has shot decently better than last year, but there have been three games where he hasn't made a shot, but attempted close to ten shots. Bottom line, he can't be the player taking the most shots on the team, it's not who he is.

Lamb. If there was to be a new leader of the Husky Nation, it was Jeremy Lamb. He worked hard over the summer just like Kemba Walker had, both competing in FIBA tournaments during their off-seasons. Lamb would be the guy to take the final shot this year when it would come to that, he should know that. 19 of 21 games Lamb has gotten into double figures, but they haven't always been pretty. If confidence in his shot is something he is lacking, who better to talk to than Kemba Walker? I will admit that I hated to see Kemba shooting back when he was a sophomore and freshmen, but look at what he turned into.

Shooting- I'll be blunt...STOP SHOOTING SO MANY THREE-POINTERS! ALSO, FREE-THROWS WIN GAMES! Not counting the Georgetown game into these statistics, UConn is shooting 69.2% from the free-throw line and 34.9% from beyond the arc. One of Drummond's flaws is his free throw shooting, shooting only 35.4%...that is terrible, even for a freshman, a Big East player, a big man. In the NCAA tournament they won games because they took far less threes than other teams and developed an inside game to match their rebounding. College basketball often becomes a glorified three-point contest, but unless you make the threes consistently, don't take so many! Set up shots off screens and picks, drive to the hoop, lay it in and get the foul call and convert from the line.

So, do I have any advice, constructive, blunt, truthful advice for the Huskies? Yes, yes I do.
      1. Practice free throws- Take time in practice to develop and reinforce correct free throw technique with each player, especially Drummond.
      2. Get Lamb's shooting stroke back.
      3. New position strategy. This is only a thought, but last year Napier came off the bench to play point guard, while Kemba, who started at point, moved to shooting guard. UConn could try the same thing, using Boatright at PG and Napier at SG. Lamb could play SG until the move, then go to SF. Olander comes out from SF for Lamb being moved over. Smith can stay in at PF, or bench him for Danials or move Oriahki from C to PF. Bring Drummond in at center. This is a team, there is no one star that can carry the team. Last year the Huskies had players playing their roles well, as well as a leader, they were a team above all else.
UConn's season isn't over yet. They are about to begin a hell stretch: 9 games, 5 at home, 2 games against Syracuse who just got Fab Mello back. Seaton Hall goes to Storrs (revenge game for Conn.), @ Louisville (a good test of how they will fair against zone defense), @ Syracuse (here we go), then DePaul at Storrs (this game can't happen quick enough for the Huskies), Marquette in Connecticut (can't wait to see this game), at Villanova (Don't sleep on this team because it's the game before Syracuse), Syracuse in Storrs (rematch), at Providence (stay alert, any Big East game is dangerous), and finishing against Pittsburgh in Storrs (Pitt. has begun to play like they used to, watch out for them). What they do in their final 9 games, as well as however many they get in the Big East Tournament is up to them. GO HUSKIES!

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

It's All About the Man Between the Pipes

(all information regarding the 1st round of the playoffs can be found on www.nhl.com)

If anything is remembered about the first round of the 2012 NHL playoffs, it shouldn't be that both #1 vs #8 series went to seven with one #8 seed winning, nor should it be that both cup teams from the previous year were eliminated (one being the President's Cup winner). Let the first round be remembered for the teams that advanced and the unified reason why: the man between the pipes.
Nashville (4-1 over Detroit), St. Louis (4-1 over San Jose), Phoenix (4-2 over Chicago), LA (4-2 over Vancouver), NYR (4-3 over Ottawa), Philadelphia (4-2 over Pitt.), Washington (4-3 over Boston), and New Jersey (4-3 over Florida) all won their first round series. All but two of those (New Jersey and Philadelphia) were won by one or more clutch performances by their individual goaltenders. 

Pekka Rinne for Nashville had the hardest match-up I believe in the first round. He was going up against the Detroit Red Wings: playoff pedigree and best home record in the NHL. So what if they'd fallen from challenging for the President's Cup to being the fifth seed? It's the DETROIT RED WINGS! Nonetheless, Pekka stopped 35 of 37, 41 of 43, 40 of 41, and 21 of 22 in the four games he won. His only loss was a 14 of 17 save night in a loss at home. Nashville took both in Detroit, a place where the Red Wings had lost 10 times in 41 games. 

Phoenix goalie Mike Smith astonished me in the 1st round (much to my dismay). In the six games the Coyotes and the Blackhawks go to overtime for five straight games. Smith in those games was 3-1, saving 43 of 45, 46 of 50, 35 of 37, 30 of 32, and 36 of 38 in a loss. The final game of the series may have been his best, saving all 39 shots he faced and the Coyotes made sure they wouldn't need overtime again, winning the game 4-0, and the series 4-1. 

I expected St. Louis to win their series against San Jose. As an Anaheim fan, I'm not fond of San Jose, and the Sharks haven't had the best of luck in the playoffs. The Blues have a deadly combo in Halak and Elliott between the pipes, and proved it in this series. Halak stopped 31 of 34 in a loss, then stopped all 12 shots he faced before leaving with an injury. Brian Elliot came in (who I thought should be starting the playoffs for the Blues anyways) and saved the final 17 shots, securing a win for Halak. Elliot then won the next three games, saving 26 of 29, 24 of 25, and 26 of 27 to win the series four games to one and continue San Jose's playoff woes. 

Again, any Pacific Division team I hate (as a Ducks fan). When Los Angeles faced off against the two-time President's Cup trophy winning Vancouver Canucks, I was all for the #1 seed to take the series in five. I was half right. It was the upstart Kings, behind the great goal play from Jonathan Quick that finished the cup runners-up in five games. Four goals scored in each of the first two games in Vancouver, Quick stopped 24 of 26, and an astounding 46 of 48 shots in the road wins. Coming down the Pacific coastline and to LA, Quick stopped all 41 shots from the Canucks in a game three shutout win. The only slip up Quick had in the series was game four when Vancouver got three goals past him to record their only win of the series. Quick returned to form and stopped 26 of 27 in an overtime win in Vancouver to end the finals hopes of the defending Western Conference champions.
Washington's Braden Holtby is only in his second year of NHL experience, and is called upon to eliminate the defending Stanley Cup champion Boston Bruins...this kid had the WORST match-up to deal with in the first round. Despite that, he came through for them in a grueling, physical 7-game series that the Caps pulled off the upset in. Game one he was fantastic, even in an overtime loss, saving 29 of 30 shots. Game 2 he continued to be great, saving 43 of 44 shots in a win and taking home ice away from the Bruins. Game 3 was bad, 25 saves, 4 goals allowed in a loss. Game 4, the game I first took notice of this kid. A critical game on home ice with the series momentum hanging in the balance, and he stops 44 of 45 shots in a win, terrific! Another win came in game 5, Holtby saving 34 of 37. A game 6 loss, 27 of 31 saved was bad, but only built on the suspense the series created. Game 7, put up or shut up, Holtby put up, stepped up, and saved 31 of 32 in an overtime win and first round upset.

One of the big questions going into these playoffs was: Could the New York Rangers be as good as they appeared to be during the season? The answer game in a seven game series with upstart Ottawa, with the top seed gutting out the series due to the great performances by Henrik Lundqvist. Game 1 was a 30 save out of 32 shot win on home ice, but the way the playoffs had been going I wasn't expecting the Rangers to take game 2. In an overtime loss in game 2, Lundqvist let up 3 goals and saved 29 shots in a loss that was expected by me because it was following the trend that most of the playoff series had gone. In Ottawa, game 3, Lundqvist shut out the Senators, stopping all 39 shots and took back any momentum the 8 seed wanted to develop. Game 4 was a setback, another 3 goals let up, another overtime loss. 28 of 31 isn't bad at all, but it wasn't good enough to win that night. Back in the US, game 5, series even, Lundqvist stopped 28 of 29 shots, but his team couldn't score and the Rangers were on the brink much like Vancouver. Lundqvist stepped up even more than he already had, as did the Rangers offense and they finished the Senators off with two straight wins, the New York goalie saving 25 of 27 in game 6, and 26 of 27 in game 7. 

Goalies played a huge part in the first round of the playoffs. So many great goalies took charge of their team and protected the nets so they could advance. Will it be the same in the second round? Only time will tell as the playoffs thin out to four in each conference. Smith vs Rinne (Phoenix vs Nashville), and Quick vs Elliot/Halak (Kings vs Blues) in the West. If Halak can't go, then it's all on the capable Elliot. In the East, Lundqvist and the Rangers face off against Holtby and the Capitals, while offensive-minded Philadelphia gets the New Jersey Devils and the most veteran of goalies in the playoffs: Martin Brodeur. Buckle up, the 2012 NHL Playoffs have been fantastic so far, and it doesn't look like it will end soon.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Time Tells No Lies

(typed after November 17th game vs Maine)

(My apologizes for not creating a blog during the season, it never crossed my mind as I was writing just for the fun of it. These articles have not been altered for content after having been written.)

Dear Jim Calhoun, 
 
Long time Connecticut fan here, first time writer. I first would like to offer my congratulations for your third NCAA Championship and my best wishes for a repeat. I'm not here to question your coaching choices, or abilities. I am writing this to remind you of the one absolute rule in any sport: Time Tells No Lies. 
 
Three games into the year, three lesser-quality opponents (no disrespect intended to Maine, Columbia, and Wagner), ten minutes. Ten minutes represents the combined time around that Kyle Bailey, Enosch Wolf, and Brendan Allen have played. In these three games, the Huskies led by an average of 19 points with 5 minutes left in the game. At that point in time any number of the three mentioned players above should have taken off their warmups and played the final five minutes. Bailey and Allen could alternate between point and shooting guard positions to see which was the better ball-handler and leader on offense (Kemba was a better shooting guard than point guard, but played point at the start of every game). Worst case scenario is that freshmen Ryan Boatright will be ruled ineligible and dismissed from the team. If that happens, Shabazz Napier is left all alone and cannot play forty minutes. Bottom line: Pick Allen or Bailey or even Ethan White or P.J. Cochrane as the second string point guard, and have them get to work.

Those not chosen to back up Napier at point should get to work as shooting guards to back up Lamb since he's the guard for now. Just like Napier, Lamb can't play the full game. I shouldn't say that about either though. More accurately, Napier and Lamb can play the full forty minutes, but neither should if UConn wants to be successful. Niels Giffey is my choice for backup shooting guard though. He's seen action last season, has a decent stroke from beyond the three-point line, and has seen more playing time than any of the mentioned players above.

Enosch Wolf is another story. I've seen very little of him throughout last season and that trend seems to be continuing. From the few plays I saw of him against Maine, I am inclined to question his ball control and ability to see the defense in front of him. He did record a blocked shot when he shifted over on a baseline drive late in the game against Maine. Wolf is 7 feet, 1 inches tall and 260 pounds, and looks to be lanky for that weight. I'm not encouraged by his play, but I would like to see him expand as a player because he, like Bailey and Allen need to develop early to function as insurance policies.

Michael Bradley, the 6-10 freshmen who gave up his scholarship so Connecticut could recruit and put on scholarship Andre Drummond (though I believe Wolf being taken off scholarship would've been a better move, but then could not be explained as well as Bradley and Drummond being long-time friends) has not played a single minute in a Husky uniform. He sat out all of last year because of the transfer rule, and then had foot surgery during the summer and will be available in early December, Big East playtime. Bradley is a promising prospect, and I'm excited about him, Drummond, and veteran and team leader Alex Oriakhi forming a front court that would average 6-10 in height and 250 pounds, but I'm realistic. Bradley, like Drummond will have to learn how to play in the Big East.

DeAndre Daniels was the big steal in recruiting for UConn. Ranked #30 in the country, and seemingly off their radar for targets, they sneak in and scoop him up. Daniels has shown his talent in the first three games, averaging 24 minutes a game, 9.3 points, 5.6 rebounds and 2 blocks a game. Each game he has increased his minutes and points. Daniels will be a great addition at Small Forward, backing up the surprisingly offensive Tyler Olander and defensive Roscoe Smith. Olander has been a sure player the first three games and was a starter last year, filling in at the beginning of games until the offense switched Walker to the two-guard and Lamb would be at SF. As for Roscoe, I still remember Smith for throwing up a last second shot from well beyond half court at Texas last season...with seven seconds left and almost costing UConn the game. Despite this, he's proven himself as a starter and a good player. Having four possible players at the forward positions (I'll get to Drummond in a moment), will solidify the front-court Bottom line: The front-court is not a problem in Storrs, CT.

Drummond should not once say the words NBA, draft, lottery, or talk about if he's thinking about any of those things until next April. He has too much to worry about already. With regard to “expectations”, Drummond should only concentrate on getting better. This man is capable of many things, but is able to fail just like so many others. Drummond has to grow into his body and play like it. 6-11, 275-pound forward/center, runs the floor like a forward, tons of energy and talent. I like all that about him, but he should be able to play like his size. The way Drummond plays in the center through the first three games reminds me of Hasheem Thabeet. When Thabeet began Big East play, he was lost. Drummond is a better player right now than Thabeet ever was, and he has an endless amount of growth he can do. As of right now, he is soft in the middle, and in the Big East that is a serious flaw. I don't want to watch Drummond get shoved, plowed over, and blocked out by guys that are four inches shorter, twenty pounds lighter, but have better post skills than him. Bottom line: Alex Oriakhi, take Drummond under your wing and show him how to play Big East basketball. Make him into the kind of swing player he can be.

Three games in, the defending champs are 3-0 (as they should be). They have flaws that are correctable, a coach that should be able to see these flaws, and fix them before Big East play starts.
Designate a backup PG
Designate a backup SG
Designate a backup C
Polish Drummond's skills

This checklist isn't asking much, and with the talent the Huskies have, it'd be a shame to see them waste the time they have right now to correct their flaws and come into Big East play without any obvious flaws. I almost forgot, Mr. Calhoun, another reason to tend to this checklist...YOU AREN'T COACHING THE FIRST THREE GAMES OF THE BIG EAST SCHEDULE FOR UConn. I leave you to your coaching, and hope you don't just rely on what worked last year, because it won't work forever. Time tells no lies, it waits for no one. So get to perfecting a team that could be perfect with your coaching. As they say, “no time like the present”.